They dare not speak its name
/In fact, nothing further need be said at all
“Attack”, not terrorism; “Easter worshippers”, not christians, nd for heaven’s sake, don’t mention the muslim terrorists who have taken credit for this atrocity
Greenwich, Connecticut real estate, politics, and more.
Greenwich, Connecticut real estate, politics, and more
In fact, nothing further need be said at all
“Attack”, not terrorism; “Easter worshippers”, not christians, nd for heaven’s sake, don’t mention the muslim terrorists who have taken credit for this atrocity
1 Old Round Hill Lane, listed in April, 2016, at $8.495 million, can now be yours for $5.495.
Just sayin’.
34 Midwood Road, in Deer Park, has dropped from it’s June, 2017 price of $7.850 million to $5.995. next time you hear that out $7-$9 million inventory is shrinking, houses like this one, 373 Taconic (below) and 1 Old Mill Road (above) are the reason why.
The Kinkaid look or not, no one seems to desire 12,000 sq.feet of house up near the Banksville border
373 Taconic Road was priced by its builder in 2005 for $12.750. but eventually sold to the current owners that same year for $9.350. They, in turn, listed it for $9.750 in March, 2016, and have been dropping its price ever since. Today’s cut brings it down to $5.5 million.
That must be discouraging.
150 Riverside Avenue was listed in March, 2014 at $4.125 million,nd has sat on the market every since, despite a succession of price “adjustments”. It finally dropped to $2.5, probably about where it always should have been, and today is reported as under contract.
I’ve always loved this 1873 house; it’s lost most of its original acreage, but still retains a half-acre, and the current owners made some much needed renovation during their years here. There was never anything wrong with this place except its pricing; once that was addressed, a buyer appeared.
Strange, that.
Off for a family Easter celebration, blogging will be light-to-non-existent this weekend, but back on Monday. Happy Easter, Happy Passover.
Hartford Democrats pitch 2% tax on “the wealthy”. I also read recently that Looney wants to see a “mansion tax” imposed on what he and his peers think are expensive homes — in Greenwich, that’s probably every house.
Anybody got a dime?
And that’s just the number of people who show up at actual border checkpoints; how many more simply cross over in unguarded sections? Mel Brooks would suggest “none”, but this isn’t a Mel Brooks movie.
Netflix has come under fire for allegedly trying to palm off fake information about walrus deaths as serious proof of climate change.
Netflix’s acclaimed Our Planet series has come under fire for “tragedy porn” over images of walruses falling to their deaths from cliff tops, allegedly because of climate change.
The Our Planet footage, narrated by David Attenborough, showed dozens of the animals climbing up 80 metre high outcrops in northeast Russia because of a lack of sea ice.
They were shown plunging onto the rocks below, with hundreds of dead animals piled on the shoreline. A voice-over by Attenborough claimed their poor eyesight made it hard for them to return safely to the ocean.
However, it turns out a more reasonable explanation exists when it comes to these walrus deaths, according to Dr. Susan Crockford, a Canadian zoologist specializing in evolution and the ecology of Holocene mammals (including polar bears and walrus):
Dr Susan Crockford, a zoologist, told The Telegraph that Netflix’s narrative over the Our Planet scene is “contrived nonsense” and that “This powerful story is fiction and emotional manipulation at its worst”.
“The walruses shown in this Netflix film were almost certainly driven over the cliff by polar bears during a well-publicised incident in 2017.”
“Even if the footage shown by Attenborough was not the 2017 incident in Ryrkaypiy, we know that walruses reach the top of cliffs in some locations and might fall if startled by polar bears, people or aircraft overhead, not because they are confused by shrinking sea ice cover.”
At the time of this report, Netflix has not identified the site, or sites, that were included for the walrus herd in their film or specified exactly when the cliff incident occurred.
Anthony Watts, weather technology expert and author of the “Watts Up With That” climate website, has taken a look at the footage and also suspects the footage captured was the 2017 Siberian incident.
I’ve been able to show that Crockford’s supposition about the geographical origin of the footage is correct: analysis of the rock shapes in the film and in a photo taken by the producer/director both match archive photos of Ryrkaypiy. The photo was taken on 19 September 2017, during the events described by the Siberian Times.
But whereas the Siberian Times and Gizmodo website, which also reported on the 2017 incident, were both quite clear that the walruses were driven over the cliffs by polar bears, Netflix makes no mention of their presence. Similarly, there is no mention of the fact that walrus haulouts are entirely normal. Instead, Attenborough tells his viewers that climate change is forcing the walruses on shore, where their poor eyesight leads them to plunge over the cliffs.
This is all very troubling as it raises the possibility that Netflix and the WWF are, innocently or otherwise, party to a deception of the public.
Watts also notes that Neflix isn’t the first company trying to peddle wildlife tragedy porn.
In 1958 Walt Disney produced “White Wilderness,” part of the studio’s “True Life Adventure” series. “White Wilderness” featured a segment on lemmings, detailing their strange compulsion to commit mass suicide.
According to a 1983 investigation by Canadian Broadcasting Corporation producer Brian Vallee, the lemming scenes were faked. The lemmings supposedly committing mass suicide by leaping into the ocean were actually thrown off a cliff by the Disney filmmakers. The epic “lemming migration” was staged using careful editing, tight camera angles and a few dozen lemmings running on snow covered lazy-Susan style turntable.
One can (almost) forgive Netflix of failing to mention the polar bears who caused these deaths, because it, and global warmists everywhere, used up their credibility a decade ago when they claimed that those bears were dying off from a similar loss of ice. There are more polar bears than ever these days, so it must be embarrassing to even bring up the subject.
As I’ve said for years, if Global Warming is real, and “settled science” why do proponents of the theory so often feel compelled to lie about it?
Be notified of new posts! Sign-up here:
Want to comment without registering?