Every parent in Riverside would have been arrested for this heinous act of neglect when we were kids and walked to school

The cutoff distance for school buses in Greenwich in the 60’s was one mile; anything shorter, kids were expected to make their own way to school and back, and we all walked frequently to Old Greenwich (even — gasp — Cos Cob, and sometimes, Greenwich) unarmed and unaccompanied.

REPORT: Police Arrest Georgia Mother After Son Walked Roughly One Mile Into Town

Police reportedly arrested a mother in Georgia on Oct. 30 after her 11-year-old son walked less than one mile into town away from his home.

Brittany Patterson, a mother of four, donned an orange jumpsuit after police handcuffed her during dinner at her home, fingerprinted her and took her mugshot at the station in Fannin County, according to Reason, a Libertarian publication. A female sheriff reportedly found her son, Soren, strolling downtown Mineral Bluff without an adult.

Mom Jailed for Letting 10-Year-Old Walk Alone to Town https://t.co/9ORvKPkfWx via @reason

ParentsUSA is defending this Mom against criminal charges . . . because her son, days away from turning 11 years old, walked into town – population 370, along a stretch of road with speed…

— ParentsUSA (@NatlAssnParents) November 12, 2024

Patterson initially thought her son was playing in the woods when he was not home to join her other child for a doctor’s appointment, the outlet reported. The 11-year-old was already walking around the nearby town of just 370 people, where he was spotted by a woman who called the police.

A female sheriff brought Soren home to his grandfather before Patterson returned home, Reason reported.

Patterson’s family lives on 16 acres of property with her kids and her father.

“The mentality here is more Free-Range,” she told the outlet.

“I was not panicking as I know the roads and know he is mature enough to walk there without incident,” the mother said. The sheriff disagreed.

The female sheriff arrived at Patterson’s door with another officer around 6:30 p.m., according to the outlet. The officers ordered the mother to put her hands behind her back and then placed in her handcuffs, Reason reported.

“She kept mentioning how he could have been run over, or kidnapped or ‘anything’ could have happened,” Patterson told the outlet.

Patterson was released the next day on $500 bail, the outlet reported. A case manager from the Division of Family and Child Services (DFCS) assessed her home, went to her eldest son’s school for an interview and presented the mother with a “safety plan,” according to Reason.

DFCS’s “safety plan” reportedly required Patterson to delegate a “safety person” to watch over her children whenever she leaves the home. It also demanded she download an app to monitor Soren’s location, which she rejected, according to the outlet.

“I will not sign,” the mother made clear after contacting her attorney, according to Reason.

Handcuffed, held overnight in jail? Bankrupt these people.

True in Maine: elections in the past decade have seen out of state Democrats' money flood in by the tens of millions of dollars

Posted on November 12, 2024 by Steven Hayward in The Daily Chart

The Daily Chart: Cash and (Don’t) Carry

The Wall Street Journal‘s editorial page notes the irony that it was the Supreme Court rulings on campaign spending that Democrats have deplored and compared to Dred Scott that enabled Democrats to vastly outspend Republicans in the election cycle just concluded:

The [Democratic] party was spared from an even bigger rout by their huge advantage in campaign spending, and for that they can thank their billionaire donors—and the Supreme Court they love to hate.

Kamala Harris raised more than $1 billion and spent more than $900 million, while the Trump campaign raised around $380 million and spent more than $350 million. In swing states Democrats had the edge in campaign spending across the board.

Their ratings never recovered once they lost their airport contracts and millions of "viewers" were no longer forced to watch it and be counted

That may look like a smile’s on my face, but if you look a little bit closer, it’s easy to trace, the tracks of my tears, baby, baby, baby

CNN 'will axe top stars in layoffs that'll see hundreds fired as ratings continue to tank'

CNN is planning to wield the axe on some of its high-paid staff after dismal election ratings that cap off a disastrous period for the cable news network. 

According to an explosive new report from Puck, network executives will unleash sweeping lay-offs in a bid to save the network's flailing reputation. 

It comes after the departure of stalwart Chris Wallace, and amid reports senior stars like Wolf Blitzer and Jake Tapper have both been denied raises. 

I heard this on election night: 9 million Florida votes counted in 2 hours, the balance by midnight, but didn't realize Jeb Bush deserves credit for the improvement

It's Time for States to End Their Horrible Vote-Counting Systems and Adopt the Florida Model

It doesn’t really matter who get credit for the reform, of course, but Florida’s success shows that it can be done. So why isn’t it? There must be a reason (ahem) for stretching vote counting over days.

Guy Benson:

“… Twenty-four years ago, the outcome of a presidential election came down to the Sunshine State, spawning a chaotic, messy process that dragged into December.  Democrat Al Gore didn't concede until December 13, following weeks of legal wrangling, competing court rulings, and public protests.  George W. Bush won, fair and square, would have won by more votes under a full statewide recount (and was almost certainly harmed by news networks wrongly calling the state for Gore while voting was still underway in the most conservative part of the state).  But many Democrats never accepted the loss, and their toxic election denialism lingered for years.  After the nightmare of hanging chads, butterfly ballots, and other absurd foibles, Florida's governor -- the victor's brother -- set out to ensure that such an embarrassingly spectacle would never play out in his state again.  He undertook a fact-finding mission to gather, study, and implement as many best practices on elections logistics as possible.  The result was a 2001 overhaul that set Florida on a path, including various updates and fine-tuning over the years, to becoming the nation's gold standard in vote counting:

Five months [after the 2000 election], at the urging of Jeb Bush, the state Legislature enacted a sweeping overhaul of Florida's election rules. The Election Reform Act of 2001 banned the use of punch-card voting machines and required the secretary of state (rather than county-level elections officials) to have the final say over which kinds of voting machines could be used in the future. The law also clarified Florida's rules for automatic recounts and set more stringent time frames for the certification of vote counts—a move intended to prevent the seemingly interminable recounts in 2000. It also created new statewide rules for issuing provisional ballots and how those would be counted, with an eye toward ensuring as many Floridians as possible could vote...

..."Florida is famous among election nerds for having the fastest reporting of vote totals in the country, with near-instant results on election night," says Andy Craig, the director of election policy at the Rainey Center, a centrist think tank. In a report he authored earlier this year, Craig calls Florida's vote-processing procedures "the gold standard" for other states to follow. Per state law, counties can begin processing mailed-in ballots up to 25 days before Election Day. That includes just about everything except the actual counting: checking that signatures are valid and that the votes have been legally submitted. Counting those ballots officially begins 15 days before Election Day and must be completed by the time the polls close. Leaking the results early—a legitimate fear, as it could influence the decisions of voters yet to cast a ballot—is a felony offense. There's never been a leak. The process buys valuable time to get things right. 

“In Florida, close to 11 million votes were tabulated accurately, reliably, and quickly last week, just as we saw four years ago.  Floridians have robust early voting options at their disposal, backed up by various integrity-securing safeguards, and ballots are processed as they come in.  As soon as polls close, a huge batch of already-tabulated ballots are reported, with millions of Election Day votes counted up extremely efficiently.  Even when results are much closer than we've seen over the last two cycles, each of which resulted in GOP blowouts, races are able to be called in a timely manner, almost always on the night of the election.  This lends credibility to the process and inspires confidence about the results being fair and legitimate, even to the losing side.  There is absolutely no reason why other states cannot adopt the Florida model.  They should.  And this is not at all a partisan statement -- several of my Democratic friends concede that Florida simply has a sound, replicable system.”

… Florida has demonstrated how even quite a lot of early and mail-in balloting can be accommodated without ludicrously drawn-out counting procedures.  Maintaining outdated, inefficient, idiotic systems in place is a choice.  How can that choice be justified?  Here's a spokesman for Florida's governor rebutting the excuses made by an Arizonan:

It would take a heart of stone to watch Li'l Rachael and her friends cry, and not to laugh

In the meanwhile, the entire MSNBC pack has worked through denial to anger, but still have three more stages of grief to traverse. I don’t think “acceptance” is gonna happen, but I’ll settle for depression.

Return of the peasantry

“scotland blows up its last coal plant as part of its green energy transition”

Earlier today I posted on Britain’s woes with “renewable”, sporadic power; the article I excerpted was in turn based on an article appearing in the Daily Telegraph: Britain’s wind power falls to virtually zero as Miliband prepares to cut reliance on gas. Just when western countries are facing (at least) a ten-fold increase in energy demand because of planned huge artificial intelligence factories and mandates that will require houses to be heated, and all internal combustion engines, from lawn mowers, to cars, to trucks, to locomotives to run on electricity, the supply of energy is being cut off. Western countries are going to crash.

But that’s a feature, not a bug, for the groups pushing this agenda, who have been working for decades to deindustrialize the west and return it to a mythical state of nature, where all is peace and harmony, and the population (reduced by famine and disease from 7 billion to one billion) will be “free to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, to fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, and criticize after dinner”, just as they please. That Marx’s Eden has never materialized is of no matter — this time, with the Greens running things, it will be different. And if not, well, they expect to be atop the rulig class anyway, so so what?

The picture of a coal factory being blown up, by the way, is part of their plan to not just end reliance on coal, but to ensure that there will be no going back. When the winter winds wail and the lights fail, well, that’s life, innit?

The Washington Post, of all publications, has an interesting article on this subject (reachable behind the paper’s paywall by disabling Java on your browser.) Here are excerpts:

Britain ditched coal. Here’s what the world can learn from it.

October 4, 2024 at 7:05 a.m. EDT

The last operating coal power plant in Britain closed this week, ending more than 140 years of coal-fired electricity and proving that major economies can wean themselves off the dirtiest fossil fuel.

“Proving” nothing, in fact — wait for the next cloudy, windless day, or for nightfall.

“It’s a massive movement,” said Dave Jones, an electricity analyst at Ember, a London-based think tank. “The fact that the first country in the world to have a coal power plant, to lean so heavily into coal starting the industrial revolution, is now out of coal is extremely symbolic.”

…. In the 20th century, as trains, ships, stoves and other machines switched to oil and gas, coal retained its central role in running the turbines that power plants use to generate electricity. In recent decades, efforts to turn off coal-fired power plants have accelerated given their outsize contribution to global warming.

Although Britain still uses coal for steel manufacturing, which accounts for 2 percent of the country’s greenhouse gas emissions, experts say the country’s transition from coal-fueled electricity offers lessons to other countries seeking to phase it out.

But who needs steel? The Chinese will make it for us.

Joel Jaeger, a climate and energy research at the World Resources Institute, said Britain’s transition from coal is “truly historic” and “proves that other countries can also achieve rapid speeds of coal reduction.”

Few economically developed countries have completely phased out coal. Most that have, such as Iceland, Switzerland, Sweden and Norway, have little need for coal because they generate plenty of power with an older generation of carbon-free technologies: hydroelectric dams, nuclear power plants and geothermal reservoirs.

Britain is one of the first countries, and the largest, to phase out coal by relying heavily on wind and solar. Portugal also did so, but it is smaller and less heavily industrialized. Germany has tried, but it still produces about a quarter of its power with coal and does not plan to complete its phaseout until 2038

… Germany’s clean-energy transition has been slower because it has few hydroelectric dams, and it shut down all of its nuclear plants, which together generated 30 percent of the country’s electricity in 2000. Britain gets about 15 percent of its electricity from nuclear plants, while Portugal makes about a quarter of its power with hydroelectricity.

And all of this is for naught, as those who are doing this to us very well know:


Developing countries such as China and India have no prospect of abandoning coal anytime soon.

China is installing renewable power faster than any other country in the world, but coal generation is also necessary to fuel the country’s rapid development.

[NPR, March 2, 2023: China is building six times more new coal plants than other countries, report finds.

“China permitted more coal power plants last year than any time in the last seven years, according to a new report released this week. It's the equivalent of about two new coal power plants per week. The report by energy data organizations Global Energy Monitor and the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air finds the country quadrupled the amount of new coal power approvals in 2022 compared to 2021.”

(And we now return you to our regularly scheduled article)

Last year’s United Nations climate change negotiations in Dubai stalled over resistance from China and India to committing to phasing out fossil fuels. The conference finally adopted a plan to phase “down” fossil fuels.

Even after coal is gone from the electricity mix, countries will be confronted with the next phase of the clean-energy transition: completely decarbonizing the power sector.

“The environmental community has been pretty focused on coal because it is the most polluting fossil fuel and because it is low-hanging fruit,” Jaeger said. “I think it’s going to be harder than the coal transition.”

Renewables are fueled by blowing wind and shining sun, which are not always available. Beyond some share of power generation — 80 percent or so, Jaeger said — renewables must be backed up by dependable supplies that don’t emit greenhouse gases, which rules out natural gas.

“Grid-scale batteries have become cheaper but can still provide only about eight hours of backup power.

The U.S. and British governments have shown revived interest in nuclear power, but both countries have struggled in recent decades to build plants quickly and cheaply.

“Meanwhile, as electric vehicles and heat pumps become more common and power-hungry technologies such as artificial intelligence grow, Britain, the United States and others will be trying to make this daunting energy transition just as electricity demand is rising.”

Here are some fun charts:

Electricity Costs

U.S. 0.184

Germany: 0.530

U.K.: 0.368

China: 0.078

India: 0.077