Literasey r us

I’m so old, I remember when reporters, even those at the NY Post, understood basic English idioms or, if they didn’t, had editors who did, and would spot and correct them. That day is past.

This article that caught my eye this morning:

Category 5 storm about to clobber Jamaica

Here’s the lead in — so far, so good:

“A Category 5 behemoth, Melissa is poised to crash head-on into Jamaica by Tuesday morning — the first storm of its size to make landfall on the island since hurricanes began being recorded in 1850, Fox Weather told The Post.

But then, uh-oh:

And it pales in comparison to the strongest storm to hit Jamaica — Hurricane Gilbert, a Category 3 that made landfall in 1988 — which damaged or destroyed at least a fifth of the island’s buildings at a cost of $2.5 billion and killed 45 people.”

No, honey, you’ve got that exactly backwards, thereby turning a declarative sentence into gibberish. I realize it doesn’t speak well of me that I should find myself annoyed by such a petty thing so early in the morning, but to quote the vegetable, “C’mon, man”.

Old Greenwich contract

20 Center Drive, marked down to $2.995 million from $3.195. I wrote about this property, tongue only partly in cheek, when it was first listed in September:

Located in "one of Greenwich's most beloved neighborhoods" and in "the coveted Dundee school" district, there's no question that this one won't last

The renovator/builder paid $1.350 million for it in May 2024, when it looked like this:


Sales activity reported

A sale; a contract; and one straight to pending

Note: I requested Chat to spread a zebra skin rug on the driveway and place a child’s toy tipi on top; it refused my request, and when I asked why, this was the response:

“I can’t generate or edit images that depict animal-skin products (like zebra rugs) or objects associated with children in a potentially ambiguous or unsafe context (like a toy tipi placed outdoors on a driveway).”

Grok was more accommodating, but its pictures aren’t as good as Chat’s

:

AI-enhanced Real Estate Listings

217 Josephine Evaristo Avenue

It’s happening right here in Greenwich, too; for instance, I’ve noticed an increasing number of zebras and tipis cropping up all over the place. And don’t get me started on The Orange.

The following text is from Slate, so grain of salt and all that, but this part seems on target:

“What we are seeing is experimentation on the edges, mostly in consumer marketing or social media content,” Kevin Greene, the general manager of real estate solutions for a data solutions company, told Slate. “The ability to generate a full property listing from scratch is here, but it’s not being used in the MLS.” (MLS stands for “multiple listing service,” a private digital database that realtors and brokers use to circulate listings.)

Greene says most property agents are using A.I. to generate the descriptions for these listings, something he argues does save them a lot of time. In fact, he believes that it’s the “subtle” use of this tech that should be more concerning for buyers and renters.

“The bigger risk isn’t full fabrication; it’s subtle manipulation. Tools that can brighten a photo can also remove power lines, add trees, or replace grass with a pool—and that’s where things start to cross the line,” he said. “What matters most is whether that content reflects ‘ground truth data,’ which means the verified, factual attributes of a property drawn from public records, imagery, and on-site validation.”

Derek Leben, an associate professor at Carnegie Mellon University who teaches courses on A.I. and ethics, agrees that using A.I. language models to render descriptions of a house is not irresponsible, but that presenting images that do not live up to reality is deceptive.

“If you provide information that’s misleading, that’s an instance of deceptive practice,” Leben explained. “In traditional ethics law, this happens around fraud or false advertising. For example, if a company shows a picture in their ad of a cheeseburger, but it’s not a real cheeseburger and it looks nothing like a cheeseburger you’d order in the restaurant, is that falsified information? Not really. You’re not giving lies. It’s not untrue, but it’s perhaps misleading.”

And, as Leben notes, these practices can result in wasting people’s time if they go and tour the place. In the worst-case scenario, a client can enter a contract under false premises.

“In cases where people buy properties sight unseen, it would be a stronger case that they made that contract under misleading pretenses and for it to be null and void,” Leben said.

For real estate photographers, he is concerned about the displacement of their work. “The ‘A.I. is going to take our jobs’ worry is real, and we call this job displacement.”

Torres and his peers are also concerned about widespread A.I. adoption, namely how easy it may seem for agents to overlook hiring professional photographers for listings. “In the future, agents will only need to know from which angle to take each photo—something they can learn in just a few hours with a cheap tripod—and leave the editing to A.I.,” he said. “It won’t be the same result as a professional photographer, but it will be good enough for the listing to look decent.”