Peepers Hollow sale

Technically, 366 Riversville Road, 2.42 acres, sold for $1.5 million, asked $1.795. The previous owner optimistically looked for $1.950 million back in 2009 and kept looking until he finally sold to these owners for $1.275 in June ‘22.

There are two cottages on the property, including 22 Peepers Hollow which was or is available for rent for the astonishing sum of $3,095, plus utilities and fees. If memory serves, my older brother John rented one of these cottages back in the 1970s, or he did until he returned from work to discover that the propane delivery driver had set the place on fire and burned it down. I guess they rebuilt.

Lightning Quiz: How many Somalian Refugees were shot in the Lewiston Maine Massacre of ‘23?

for that matter, how many united way executives were injured?

Uh, that would be none, Bob, but they got a substantial piece of the pie anyway

Relief Fund Money for Lewiston Survivors Steered to Inter-Linked NGOs Instead of Victims, Residents Say

Too valuable to waste on victims

In the wake of the October 25, 2023 mass shooting in Lewiston, thousands of Mainers and donors across the country collectively contributed more than $6.6 million to support victims, families, and the community. More than two years later, questions persist about where almost a third of those funds have gone.

The Maine Community Foundation (MCF) was identified as the primary organization to collect and distribute the relief funds, which were promoted as a way to directly help those most affected by the tragedy. Its distribution of this money is what has led many to wonder aloud why a portion of the funds was sent to seemingly unrelated groups.

Financial records show that $4.7 million was eventually distributed to survivors and to the families of the deceased. However, approximately $1.9 million of the total went to nonprofit organizations rather than directly to victims. The decision to divide the funds in this way has raised questions from community members, survivors, and former state officials regarding transparency and oversight of the distribution process. 

The nonprofit portion of the funding was directed by a steering committee assembled as part of the recovery effort. The committee included leadership from United Way of Androscoggin County, Gateway Community Services Maine, the Somali Bantu Community Association, and Tree Street Youth. Each of those organizations later received more than $65,000 in relief funds. 

Although MCF publicly stated that part of the donation pool was intended to support long-term community recovery, the foundation has not provided detailed explanations of how potential conflicts of interest were identified or addressed during the allocation process. Survivors and family members have said that they believed the relief donations would primarily, and in some cases exclusively, support those directly harmed by the shooting.

Gateway Community Services Maine received more than $65,000, in addition to $42,000 it had already received from MCF earlier in 2023. The organization’s affiliated for-profit division has been involved in a reimbursement dispute with the Maine Department of Health and Human Services concerning more than $700,000 in questioned MaineCare billing. 

The Somali Bantu Community Association also received more than $65,000. Tax filings show payments from the organization to family members of its co-founder, and the group holds multiple state-funded service contracts. This Maine Wire reporter visited location on Monday, seeking comment on how the funds were used. I was told that the staff accountant would be in contact, the Maine Wire has not heard back.

United Way of Androscoggin County was awarded more than $65,000 from the relief pool, while also receiving $312,593 in donor-restricted contributions specifically designated for Lewiston shooting response. Records indicate that a substantial portion of these Lewiston-designated funds remained undistributed as of late 2024. Some survivors stated they have not been contacted by the organization regarding support services. 

Tree Street Youth received more than $65,000, in addition to the more than $1 million it receives annually through government grant funding. When the nonprofit awards were announced, Tree Street Youth director Julia Sleeper said, “These organizations are crucial to the fabric of our community and to the recovery process.” 

However, several survivors and affected family members reported that they did not recall receiving outreach or services from the group following the shooting. The Maine Wire also visited this organization on Monday, was told the CEO would respond to our questions, we did not hear back prior to publication.

Two other organizations, the AK Collaborative and Generational Noor, each received awards of more than $65,000 as well. Public filings do not show state charitable registrations for either group, and both appear to have had limited ongoing operations after receiving the funds. The AK Collaborative’s online presence ceased activity in 2024, while Generational Noor relocated its office into the same location as Gateway Community Services. 

The Maine Community Foundation has directed inquiries to its general public reporting and previous statements, but it has not released additional documentation addressing how committee members participated in allocation decisions related to their own organizations.

Former Maine Gov. Paul LePage (R) has publicly questioned how the $1.9 million in nonprofit-directed funds was allocated. LePage has sought a clearer accounting of how the organizations were selected, what criteria were used to determine funding levels, and what oversight was conducted after the awards were made.

“Victims and families should receive a full investigation into what was communicated both to them and donors by the Foundation, why these unconnected groups received cash, and how it was spent. These families deserve answers,” LePage said.

Jennifer Zanca, who was shot in the arm during the shooting, said she learned that nonprofits received more funding than she did while she faced an unpaid $93,000 hospital bill that her insurance denied.

“I am torn between gratitude for the support, then angered when I was facing a $93,000 outstanding hospital bill that was denied by insurance,” Zanca said.

Survivors and families have stressed that they are not asking for funds to be retracted from organizations at this time. Instead, they say they are seeking clarity about how relief funds were managed, whether donor intent was followed, and whether the steering committee’s process included sufficient safeguards to prevent conflicts of interest.

The central issue for many remains whether the distribution of nearly $2 million in nonprofit support aligned with the expectations of donors who believed they were contributing directly to victim recovery. Families and survivors continue to call for greater transparency, including a detailed record of how each nonprofit used the funds it received and what specific services were delivered as a result.

Here you go: see any Somalians here?

The following 18 people were the victims who died in the mass shootings in Lewiston, Maine, on October 25, 2023: 

At Just-In-Time Recreation (bowling alley):

  • Tricia C. Asselin, 53

  • Thomas Ryan Conrad, 34

  • Michael R. Deslauriers II, 51

  • Jason Adam Walker, 51

  • Lucille M. Violette, 73

  • Robert E. Violette, 76

  • Aaron Young, 14

  • William A. Young, 44 

At Schemengees Bar & Grille Restaurant:

  • William Frank Brackett, 48

  • Peyton Brewer-Ross, 40

  • Maxx A. Hathaway, 35

  • Bryan M. MacFarlane, 41

  • Keith D. Macneir, 64

  • Ronald G. Morin, 55

  • Joshua A. Seal, 36

  • Arthur Fred Strout, 42

  • Stephen M. Vozzella, 45

  • Joseph Lawrence Walker, 57 

Cognitive dissonance in North Mamdaniland

The Unicorn voters ushered in draconian rent control regulations in 2018, and already the effects are being felt as the existing available housing stock shrinks. Then they turned their destructive attention to new housing, with exactly the results you, but not they, would expect.

Portland Maine Housing Projects Stall as Costs Collide with ‘Inclusive’ Zoning Mandate

Despite dozens of approved projects and strong demand for new housing, several major developments in Portland are stalled as rising construction and financing costs collide with the city’s inclusionary zoning ordinance, developers and city officials said during a November 6 panel hosted by the Portland Regional Chamber of Commerce.

The ordinance, approved by voter referendum in 2020, requires housing projects with 10 units or more to set aside 25 percent of units for lower- to middle-income households or pay an in-lieu fee of $182,830 per unit. Combined with higher construction prices and interest rates, panelists said the mandate has made some projects financially unworkable.

Jonathan Culley, principal of Redfern Properties, said his company has roughly 800 units currently on hold, including a 327-unit project on Washington Avenue and a 500-plus unit development planned for Kennebec Street. Redfern, which has built nearly a thousand apartments and condominiums in Portland since 2013, completed its most recent project, the 263-unit Casco building, in 2024.

Culley said neither of the newer projects will move forward under current conditions. 

“It would cost us $15 million to the city right off the bat,” he said of the Washington Avenue development.

City planning director Kevin Kraft said Portland has approved more than 45 housing projects since 2020, including approvals for about 1,300 units this year. He pointed to recent zoning reforms under the city’s ReCode effort that allow greater density, height and flexibility for multifamily housing and accessory dwelling units.

“So ReCode has unlocked a lot of potential,” Kraft said, referring to the ordinance at the center of the debate.

Still, Culley predicted few new projects will break ground in 2026 or 2027 unless the inclusionary zoning ordinance is changed. The soonest the ordinance can be reviewed is early 2026, under terms of the referendum. Kraft said a state grant will support a data-focused review of the rule.

Panelists also cited ballooning financing costs as a significant barrier. Culley noted that when his firm closed on the Casco project, it secured a 12-year loan at 3.5 percent interest. Today, similar financing would be at more than 6 percent.

“That’s over a million dollars a year just in interest rate costs,” he said, adding that it would require a rent increase of roughly $350 per unit per month.

Other challenges include regulatory costs, building code requirements and rising pressure from neighborhood groups opposed to large developments.

Todd Morse, president of the Urbanist Coalition of Portland, said changes to building codes, including allowing more single-stair designs and increased use of mass timber, could help reduce expenses.

Culley, who serves on the city’s Social Housing Task Force, said Portland will continue to see strong housing demand driven by factors such as climate migration* and growth associated with the Roux Institute. He characterized the shortage of affordable and available housing as both an economic and humanitarian issue.

“We have people sleeping outside,” he said. “And it’s affecting our downtown business community. We’re actually hurting the people we’re trying to help.”

*”Climate Migration”? New to me, too, but you’ll be heartened to know that NGO’s and governments have identified the phenomenon and already pocketing money to address it. Who would have expected a flood of Floridian refugees swamping Portlandia? Our wise leaders, that’s who — hold on to your wallet.

AI Overview

Climate migration is the movement of people, both internal and international, who are forced or choose to relocate due to the impacts of climate change, such as sea-level rise, extreme weather, and drought. This movement can be temporary or permanent, planned or spontaneous, and it often involves people moving from rural to urban areas, though it also includes cross-border movement. Climate migration is already happening and is projected to increase, though it is complex and influenced by factors beyond environmental stressors, including economic and social conditions. 

Causes and drivers

  • Climate impacts: Climate change leads to a range of environmental changes that force migration, including rising sea levels, more frequent and intense storms, flooding, and worsening droughts.

  • Economic hardship: These climate events destroy livelihoods, particularly for those in agriculture-dependent regions, making it difficult for people to earn a living in their home communities.

  • Poverty: Poorer populations are often more vulnerable to climate impacts, as they may live in more hazardous areas and have fewer resources to adapt, making them more likely to move due to climate stressors.

  • Social networks: Existing social connections and family ties can also influence migration patterns, as people may move to join family or friends in other locations. 

Types of climate migration

  • Displacement: People are forced to leave their homes suddenly due to a specific disaster, like a flood or hurricane, and may be unable to return.

  • Migration: People move in anticipation of or in response to slower-onset changes like sea-level rise or desertification.

  • Planned relocation: Governments or other authorities can assist communities in moving from areas that are no longer habitable to new, safer locations. 

Challenges and implications

  • Vulnerability: Climate migrants often face significant challenges, including the loss of skills and assets, a higher risk of exploitation, and lack of access to essential services in their new locations.

  • Inequity: The impacts of climate change and the ability to move are not evenly distributed. The poorest populations and certain groups, such as women, are often disproportionately affected.

  • Legal and social status: The term "climate refugee" is not legally recognized under international law, which can complicate matters for those seeking protection and assistance across borders.

  • "Trapped" populations: Climate change can also prevent migration for some, as it erodes the assets needed to move, leaving them with no choice but to stay in increasingly dangerous conditions. 

Open borders

Muslim Preacher Says Americans Are So Uncivilized and Backward That They Use Toilet Paper “Allah sent us to civilize them because they are the lowest form of human nature.”

Remember the video of Mayor-Elect Zohran Mamdani sitting in the park eating a rice bowl with his hands? We felt compelled to check back and see if he was using his right hand (he was).

Here’s an example of what those civilized muslims — you know, the people who college students and Democrats so admire — are capable of:

Freed Israeli hostage reveals unthinkable horror during captivity: ‘Something even the Nazis didn’t do’

A traumatized Israeli hostage held captive for more than two years in Gaza revealed that he was sexually assaulted and tortured so sadistically by Jew-hating terrorists that he begged them to let him starve to death.

Rom Braslavski was kidnapped on Oct. 7, 2023, by the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a Hamas ally, and subsequently stripped naked, starved and sexually abused until he was finally released earlier this year, he revealed in a chilling interview with Israeli media.

“I came back from a meeting with the devil,” Braslavski told Israel’s Channel 13. 

“It was sexual violence, and its main purpose was to humiliate me,” he said. “The goal was to crush my dignity. And that’s exactly what he did.”

He said the abuse was frequent — and worse than Nazi torture.

“It’s hard for me to talk about that part specifically. I don’t like to talk about it. It’s hard. It was the most horrific thing,” Braslavski added. “It’s something even the Nazis didn’t do. During Hitler’s time, they wouldn’t have done things like this.”

During his 738 days as a hostage, Braslavski was savagely beaten with a donkey whip and subjected to 20-minute-long torture sessions seven times a day, according to the Daily Mail.

His sadistic captors also forced him to dance and blindfolded him with stones in his ears for weeks at a time, the outlet reported.

“You just pray for it to stop. And while I was there — every day, every beating — I’d say to myself, ‘I survived another day in hell. Tomorrow morning, I’ll wake up to another hell. And another. And another. It doesn’t end.’”

He was so severely beaten by his captors that he begged them to let him starve to death, according to the Times of Israel.

“They tortured me for one reason: Because I am a Jew,” he told Channel 13. “That was why I went through what I did. Not [Israeli National Security Minister Itamar] Ben-Gvir, not [Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu, not anything else. They beat me up because I’m Jewish. That’s it.”

In August, Palestinian Islamic Jihad released chilling footage showing Braslavski emaciated and crying, claiming he could not stand or walk due to pain in his feet.

It was the second video the PIJ released of the Jerusalem native. The group previously published a scripted video in which the captive, looking ill, said he was going through “hell.”

He was among the last Israeli hostages released during Hamas’ cease-fire deal with Israel last month.

I disagree: it's not an either-or proposition; embrace the power of "and"

Derek Hunter, TownHall:

Democrats Are Evil, Not Stupid

Democrats are the evil party, but that doesn’t mean they’re stupid. In fact, I often have to remind people that they are evil, not stupid, to explain why they do the things they do. They know what they’re doing, and you should too. It explains why, after more than 6 weeks, they suddenly decided to vote to reopen the government. It wasn’t because they felt people were suffering – you don’t subscribe to a political philosophy responsible for 100 million deaths in the last century if you have concern over suffering – but because it was electoral politics, plain and simple.

What changed the “principled stance” Democrats had been taking? The election happened. That’s it, that’s really all it was. If this had happened before the vote, there was a chance some Democrats, the more radical ones, would have stayed home. Disgusted people don’t generally go out and vote for the people with whom they are disgusted. 

But they did vote, and Democrats won the elections they should have won, so the threat is gone. They waited a week because they couldn’t do it immediately, lest they expose themselves as the frauds they are. But a week later has people have already forgotten how short a period of time ago the election was – “was it last week or the week before?” It really is that simple. 

Also worthy of note is the fact that none of the 8 Democrats who voted for the “deal” are up next year; they’re either retiring or have 15 political lifetimes between now and when they could next face voters. In other words, they were strategically chosen to cast just enough votes to end the shutdown while giving as many of their fellow travelers as possible the cover they need to pretend to be outraged over an end to the shutdown with nothing to show for it.

As usual, one of our best Senators predicted this way back on October 8th:

Sen. Kennedy Perfectly Called How the Shutdown Would End Weeks Ago

“It will end eventually when Senator Schumer goes to six or eight of his members and his Democrats and says, ‘Do me a favor. Vote to open it back up. I may have to criticize you, I’m not gonna vote with you, but I need a way out of this. I need an offering.’” He even warned, with his trademark wit, that Schumer would have to be careful not to make it look orchestrated. Because, as he put it, “if it looks contrived… he’s boned.”

Kennedy is so much fun:

As for what I mean about adding “AND”? Here’s some libtard radio host claiming disciplehood:

Color Revolutions

New: USAID's Secret Signal Chats Document Plot Against U.S. Leadership

“Declare that their goal is to create new "socio-political economic governance systems."

The linked-to article about former government workers conspiring against the Trump administration refers repeatedly to a “color revolution”, and looking up that term lead me, eventually, to this one in the Eurasia Review, a publication that I hadn’t heard of before. Stripping away its anti-western diatribe, it does perfectly describe what we’re seeing in the ANTIFA, pro-Hamas, pro-communist and even the Global Warming protests currently erupting on our streets and campuses. In that sense, it’s enlightening or, at the least, provides confirmation of what we already suspected. Of particular interest is the author’s contention that there are almost always government forces at work behind the scenes in these “spontaneous” eruptions.

Color Revolutions: The Most Sophisticated Means Of Warfare – Analysis

Color revolutions are political term used to describe turbulent political events: mass street protests and riots in order to achieve a revolutionary change of government. Some revolutionary upheavals are successful and some remain only attempts. However, so far they have taken place in a number of countries at the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century. 

Color revolutions broke out in the countries of the former Soviet Union, in the Balkans, in the Middle East, and more recently in other places such as Iran and China. The most popular revolutions ares: the Pink Revolution in Georgia in 2003, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine in 2004, the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan in 2005, and the Euromaidan Revolution in Ukraine in 2014. Some observers called the events a revolutionary wave whose beginnings can be traced back to 1986 and the Philippine Yellow Revolution.

The world we live in is changing more and more from day to day and so are the means of political struggle. Conquering power by military means is to some extent obsolete because people no longer have the will to die in the trenches like they used to. Classic wars are expensive and long and are being replaced by more subtle ways of conquering a certain area. One of the most important is the colored revolution. Under the guise of a democratic uprising, the removal of an unskilled government or a coup d’etat is actually being carried out. 

Most often, external powers (without exception, the West) [uh huh —Ed] sponsor, plan, organize and implement “revolutions”. The role of external forces in colored revolutions is crucial and without them they cannot arise. These are revolutions mostly in name only. In fact, it is a sophisticated form of warfare, often an international conflict, although the legal profession does not (yet) recognize it as such.

Continuity of colored revolutions

….In addition to the CIA, the State Department, the Pentagon and various US and domestic non-governmental organizations are most often engaged. In the last decade, a long list of countries with relatively stable political systems experienced colorful revolutions. Somewhere they were more and somewhere less successful: Egypt, Tunisia, Syria, Libya, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, China, Iran, Venezuela. The regime change scenarios in all these countries show striking similarities. 

The same patterns are persistently repeated, which cannot be mere coincidence. Egypt and Ukraine are very different, but the January 25 revolution in Egypt in 2011 and the Euromaidan revolution in 2014 are so similar that even the behavior of the revolutionaries was the same: moderate Islamists in Egypt and radical nationalists in Ukraine.

Definition of the phenomenon

…. The true definition of color revolutions would be that they are technologies for creating a coup and gaining control of the political situation in a certain country from abroad, under conditions of political instability, with pressure on the government through political blackmail using the youth protest movement as a means. The goal of every color revolution is a coup d’etat, or the conquest and maintenance of power by force. Despite the great differences between the countries where revolutions break out (geopolitical, social, economic and other), they all fall under the same scheme that includes the pattern of organizing a protest movement, transforming that movement into a political crowd and using the newly formed popular mass against the existing government as a means of political blackmail.

The movement of young dissidents can most often be created through the student population and the dissatisfaction of students. Students organize street protests that easily destabilize the state and can incite rebellion in other layers of society.

Causes of revolutions – spontaneous and directed scenario

… According to [one] opinion, the revolutions were staged and planned in detail. The same characteristics and scenarios were repeated in countries that have almost nothing in common. Although colored may resemble classical revolutions, they are not. Any resemblance is superficial. Real revolutions are spontaneous and come at some point in historical development, while colored revolutions are staged and carefully planned. 

… Everything follows the same pattern. There is always a youth movement, revolutionary leaders are always similar, and revolutions lack content or revolutionary ideology. It is about the people suddenly rebelling against “evil dictators” and apart from general calls for democracy, everything else is lacking or non-existent.

Three phases of color revolutions

…. According to Sharp, classical color revolutions consist of three stages. The first stage includes the creation of an “underground” movement of cells that together form a network of those dissatisfied with the ruling regime. Members are recruited with big slogans and calls to action. A network of mostly young disaffected suddenly leaves anonymity and appears on the streets of big cities in response to a certain signal. The protests want to present themselves as something spontaneous, but in fact everything was prepared earlier.

…. Members of underground cells become the initiators of the rebellion. Protests, gatherings, marches, setting up fences follow. The people realize that the government may be legal but it is illegitimate and forms an anti-government movement that becomes the driving force of the future revolutionary regime change. Of course, the initiators of the protest do everything carefully and organize the majority who really believe in the proclaimed ideals. People wouldn’t be so rampant in the streets knowing they were tools in the hands of the CIA or MI6. A political crowd forms and protests last for days or weeks in the main city squares.

In the second stage, the goal is to discredit defense, security and law and order bodies through strikes, civil disobedience, riots and sabotage. Protesters are occupying city squares and streets that they do not want to leave until their demands are met. The protestors are organized by the logistics network. In the name of the masses, the protesters give an ultimatum to the government and threaten mass uprisings if they are not satisfied. The government has two choices: retaliate with force or accept the demands. The third and final phase follows, which entails the “non-violent” overthrow of the government. In fact, it is about open attacks on authorities and the occupation of government buildings, institutions and other components or symbols of government. A kind of civil assault on the “organism” of the existing political order. If the government strikes the protesters with force, the media will accuse it of crimes and killing peaceful protesters, while if it agrees to concessions, it will be swept away very quickly because the protesters will not agree to compromises.

Bonus Material:

Pre-planned ANTIFA protest “spontaneously” erupts at Berkeley

'Berserkeley': Antifa Thugs Violently Attack Attendees at TPUSA's 'This Is Turning Point' Tour

“Here they stand, I can do no other, so help me Gaia”

Channeling Martin Luther - not

Purple hair, ok, why not? Four guys and a tub of KY? Again, I can accept that things have changed since my church-going days. But an alligator stole? Is nothing sacred?