Glad to see that the old rule, "the winner in a bidding war is the one who didn't win" still applies, at least sometimes

The until-today owners of 11 Valleywood Road, Cos Cob, took title to it just this past January 11th after their“winning” bid of $2.7 on a $2.650 asking price was accepted. They put it back up for sle September 2th at $2.8 million, and have just sold it for $2.745, Knocking off, say, 7% for transaction fees, that would be about $2.553. Not bad, but such brief periods of ownership usually don’t produce good results; although there are some neighborhoods ….

These are not all Palestinians — in fact, it wouldn't surprise me if many of them were actually just suicidal Jews

“Don’t hurt us, we voted for Kamala!”

Antisemitic mob descends on historic NYC synagogue — urging the ‘resistance’ to ‘take another settler out’

…. Some 200 demonstrators gathered outside the Park East Synagogue in Manhattan and heckled Jews attending an event by Nefesh B’nefesh, a Zionist organization that helps Jews immigrate to Israel, according to the Times of Israel.

“It is our duty to make them think twice before holding these events,” one protest leader told the crowd.

“We need to make them scared. We need to make them scared. We need to make them scared,” the agitator repeated emphatically.

The crowd also chanted “From New York to Gaza, globalize the intifada” to the beat of a drum.

“Resistance you make us proud, take another settler out,” the hate-filled group chanted at one point, video shows.

Park East Synagogue Cantor Benny Rogosnitzky on Thursday called the display “very disturbing.”

“And while the right to protest is an inherent right, last night was very disturbing, because the chants that were made by the pro-Palestinian group were chants like ‘Kill the Jews,’ ‘Destroy Israel,’ ‘No Jews in America,’ — the sort of language that you never want to hear at a protest on either side,” he told The Post.

A couple of readers mentioned this the other day, but I wasn’t really paying attention; my bad.

From Welfare to Whoppers: Taxpayer-Funded Takeout Is All the Rage in Blue States

Do you know what Arizona, California, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, Rhode Island, and Virginia all have in common? Yes, they're blue or blue-ish states, but they're also using your tax dollars to send those who receive Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits out for a night on the town. According to Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), approximately $250 million worth of SNAP benefits is spent at restaurants, mostly fast food joints, each year in those states. 

When SNAP was first established in 1964, the goal was for those who couldn't afford it to buy basics: meat, fruit, vegetables, etc., that one could cook at home. Hot food or food already ready to consume was not eligible. However, according to Ernst's office, a 1977 loophole allowed states to opt into something called the Restaurant Meals Program. 

According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) website, the program "is a state option to allow certain SNAP clients, who might not be able to prepare meals for themselves or who do not have permanent housing for storing and preparing food, to be able to buy prepared meals at restaurants with their SNAP benefits." In other words, it was designed with homeless people in mind. Eventually, the disabled and elderly were also added, along with the spouses of eligible SNAP recipients. 

…. Ernst says it started with just a few eateries, but the number has grown due to the states and restaurants taking advantage of the program. She pointed specifically to California under the Joe Biden administration. In 2021, she says that California allowed 5,800 restaurants, like McDonald's, Panda Express, Pizza Hut, Domino's, and Jack in the Box, to accept CalFresh benefits via SNAP. 

"McSCUSE ME? The "N" in SNAP stands for nutrition not nuggets with a side of fries," the senator posted on X, along with a link to the Fox News article about the situation. 

According to Fox News

Ernst's office found that from June 2023 to May 2025, more than $475 million in taxpayer dollars funded Restaurant Meals Program meals at fast-food establishments. During that same time period, $524 million in taxpayer funds were spent through the Restaurant Meals Program overall, meaning California accounted for more than 90% of the nation's total Restaurant Meals Program funds from June 2023 to May 2025, according to the office... 

The data found that between June 2023 and May 2025 $41.4 million funds went through Restaurant Meals Program in Arizona, $3.6 million in New York, $1.3 million in Michigan, $995,900 in Rhode Island, $649,000 in Massachusetts, $479,000 in Illinois, $308,500 in Virginia and $8,600 in Maryland. 

Ernst is seeking to stop the loophole with the McSCUSE ME Act, which she introduced on Thursday. The bill would limit the types of vendors SNAP recipients in those states can access, redirecting them to retail grocery stores that serve some ready-made and hot food rather than restaurants. It also removes eligibility for SNAP users' spouses.

I predict the bill will go nowhere, unless, of course, a clever politician thinks to link BadOrangeMan to McDonald’s, like this:

Or, better, bring Elon Musk into the picture:

Pending in Old Greenwich

8 Park Avenue, $4.5 million. It’s been on the market for 64 days so, presumably, it won’t be going for above its ask like its near-neighbor on 17 Highview, but still ….

This builder paid $1.695 million for 8 Park and its 0.24-acre lot in 2014 (and doubled its size in 2016) which, along with 17 Highviews sale at $4.610, makes me think that Fran Ward’s listing at 7 Highview Avenue on 0.22-acres and priced at $1.795 million, is probably right in the ballpark.

7 Park Avenue

There was a time — no, seriously; not kidding — when Yale was a respected institution of higher learning

Sara Peach is the editor-in-chief of Yale Climate Connections.

Desperate for relevancy in the rapidly fading specialty of global warming hysteria, Yale Climate Connections purports to find a connection between a now-dead pedophile who’s in the news, and Donald Trump. This is the “hard evidence” Chris Murphy must be relying on in his assertion that “Clearly, Donald Trump was at the center of a child sex ring”

Jeffrey Epstein, climate change doubter

Newly released emails show Epstein peddling climate denial myths to scientist Lawrence Krauss while Trump’s first term was getting underway.

Climate scientists overwhelmingly agree that modern-day climate change is real, mostly bad, and caused by people. But according to newly released emails, deceased child predator Jeffrey Epstein doubted that consensus.

[And of course, a trigger warning from Miss Peach’s editors]:

A heads up: In addition to references to climate-related misinformation, this article mentions allegations of sexual misconduct and crimes.

Last Wednesday, the U.S. House Oversight Committee released more than 20,000 documents from the Epstein estate, including thousands of his emails. Epstein died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking minors.

The newly released documents show that in late 2016 and early 2017, after Donald Trump was elected to his first term [Ed: where’d he come from?] Epstein exchanged emails with celebrity physicist Lawrence Krauss, who at the time was the director of the Origins Project at Arizona State University. Epstein was a major donor to the Origins Project.

In the emails, which contain numerous typos and grammatical errors, Epstein pressed Krauss – who himself left Arizona State University in 2019 amid allegations of sexual misconduct – about several common claims by climate deniers. In each exchange, Krauss politely pushed back.

…. A few months later, Krauss wrote to Epstein with a reaction to the Trump administration’s authorization of funding for NASA.

“This is not supporting science,” Krauss said. “It is all about the size of the rocket for him. All this will do is give him glory and not contribute to science.”

….Reached for comment by Yale Climate Connections, Krauss said he hoped he’d had an impact on Epstein’s perspective.

“I like to think I dispelled some myths, and provided him data to help do so,” Krauss wrote by email.

Trump echoes Epstein’s misinformation

Trump, another regular topic in Epstein’s email inbox, returned to power this year. Photographs and documents suggest that Trump and Epstein were close for years before reportedly parting ways. Trump has denied any involvement in Epstein’s crimes and has said he wasn’t a “fan” of the man.

“Well, I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him,” Trump said in 2019. “I mean, people in Palm Beach knew him. He was a fixture in Palm Beach. I had a falling out with him a long time ago.”

Still, climate change denial was a common interest of the two men. The president has called climate change a hoax, and his administration has revived the misleading claim that carbon dioxide benefits crops.

More significant is each man’s enormous wealth and personal or political power – and how they wielded both at the expense of many others.

A friend with quite a bit of experience in the political field, national and local, emailed me on this subject just a few days ago, expressing similar sentiments to the columnist I excerpt below

Here’s part of what my friend wrote::

At this point, elections are all about turning out the occasional voter. That's, literally, how Trump won.

With info sources so dispersed, messaging, etc, doesn't work as well these days.

Turnout is everything. The Dems seem to have learned that. I hate to say it, but the odds of CT's GOP figuring that out and also executing are pretty darn slim.

And here are some excerpts from a much longer essay, saying essentially the same thing:

RedState, Cliff Maloney:

If GOP Does Not Address Low Propensity Voter Problem, We Risk Another Trump Impeachment or Worse

Most voters don’t realize we just had several local elections over the last few weeks, and those elections were critical in securing the America First agenda. 

The New York City mayoral race, which was won by Zohran Mamdani, was the most prominent, but there were many other, less prominent but equally important elections across the country.

Unfortunately, we lost all but the smallest of those elections.

…. We charged into enemy territory, knowing the odds were against us, going into states such as New Jersey to support gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli. I was optimistic that Trump's blowout victory in 2024 would drag Republicans to the polls. His administration’s wins, such as securing the border with millions deported, criminals locked up instead of coddled, DOGE slashing $175 billion in waste, fraud, and abuse, that's the America First rocket fuel we promised. Yet, too many patriots stayed home, complacent or convinced "easy wins" would fall in our lap.

In New Jersey, losses hit harder than expected, with Democrat E-Day turnout exploding (Sherrill roughly +440k over Murphy's 2021 haul) while our side ghosted. Pennsylvania's "vote no to retain" on COVID-era judges? Tanked, leaving the same lockdown-loving benchwarmers to sabotage liberty. We didn't show up — we got crushed.

This isn't just a blip; it's a preview of the Democrats' endgame if we snooze.

….

The truth is that Democrats have a well-oiled machine when it comes to elections. They’ve spent decades building powerful networks of activists — in many cases, using taxpayer funds to do so, but that’s a topic for another day. They have massive email lists, and they leverage social media like a passionate insurgent group. They vote early and use mail-in ballots to maximize their votes. And most of all, they show up consistently and move in lockstep.

In short, they do everything that we need to be doing, but are not.

And if we don’t change that, they will eat our lunch and destroy America in the process.

While presidential and congressional elections tend to get most of the attention, there are thousands of smaller local elections in between that can have just as much, if not more, impact.

That’s why these elections are so critical. 

We can’t just match the Democrats’ efforts — we need to surpass them. 

The energy, discipline, and focus that carried us through the presidential campaign must now be directed toward state and local battles.

….Local elections play a key role in what happens locally, but they also have a national impact. 

…. We failed this time, and the margins weren’t even close. This was devastating, but there’s a silver lining here, and it’s that this could be the wake-up call that Republicans need to see that we absolutely need to be all in.

…. New York City was once the financial capital of the world, and it’s now turning into yet another socialist hellscape where it’s nearly impossible to do business or for the average resident to even afford a modest lifestyle. The long-running exodus from New York City highlights the failures of socialism, and yet the left keeps doubling down on this ideology that has failed literally everywhere it’s ever been implemented. In fact, Mamdani recently cited Eugene Debs, the Socialist Party founder, during an interview, attempting to justify his policies. New York's exodus is already in motion, and it’s going to get a lot worse. 

…. These upcoming midterms are absolutely ours to lose. If Republicans sleepwalk and hand Congress back, mark my words, the impeachment circus restarts. Trump on trial, us scrambling from a position of defense in 2028. The unleashed Democrats crave retaliation: more witch hunts, open borders, $36.2 trillion debt bombs.

We've got low-propensity voter turnout as our Achilles' heel, but it's fixable. Democrats' machine— taxpayer-funded activists, endless mail-in chases, lockstep obedience — built their electoral cartel over decades. 

We need to respond with people power. Groups like Citizens Alliance, Turning Point Action, America First Works, Heritage Action, Early Vote Action, and many more have already proven what can happen when we invest in grassroots organizing. 

When Republicans knock on doors and collect ballots, we win.

It’s that simple.

Personally, I’m pessimistic that is that simple, because voters seem to turn out when they have a specific issue that’s excited them, and otherwise stay home. The Blue’s have abortion, global warming/extinction in 12 6 years, the end of welfare as they like it, etc., while we have more general issues: overregulation, free enterprise, national security, and the like.

Can anyone convince stay-at-homes that the birth of the regulatory era, symbolized by the increase of pages of the Code of Federal regulations from 20,000 pages annually in 1970 to 100,000 in 2025, has been a primary cause of the “unaffordability crisis” of today? That it’s the forced expenditures by energy providers to “invest” in “Green Energy” boondoggles that has cause electricity prices to treble? Not when there are simple slogans that can be rallied around without having to sit down and think them through: “socialism!”; “greedy capitalists!”; “Magic!”

The 80/20 rule says that 8 out of 10 newspaper readers don’t go beyond the headlines, and a similar percentage is found among FaceBook users. An intelligent conversation with these people is impossible.

Which doesn’t mean, I suppose, that we shouldn’t try, but my money’s on bread and circuses bringing down the republic, rather than careful thought preserving it.

Not just dumb, but a deliberate liar. Amazingly, CNN calls her on it

(A satirical summary of her double-back)

Name Game: Dem Jasmine Crockett’s Two Epsteins Debacle Ends in a Dumb Double Down on CNN

Jeffrey Epstein donated money to Republicans. Well, not THE Jeffrey Epstein, but someone who shares the same name. That didn’t stop Democrat Jasmine Crockett from lying and trying to pass off one Epstein for the other. She got caught and called out for it. So, of course, she is now doubling down on her lie.

Here’s more.

Jasmine Crockett makes an absolute fool of herself when she is asked to correct the record about accusing Republicans of taking donations from a different Dr. Jeffrey Epstein:

"That is specifically why I said *a* Jeffrey Epstein. Just because it wasn't the same one, that's fine... Have I dug in to find out who this doctor is? I have not."

It’s my understanding that the foulmouthed Congresswoman is being coached in how to speak to her base by an expert, Senator “What we’ve already seen is immensely incriminating. Clearly, Donald Trump was at the center of a child sex ring” Chris Murphy.

Governance of the people, by the judiciary, for the friends of the judiciary

“Now we are engaged in a great civil war that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

Or, as Yeats asked, “what rough beast, its hour come round at last,. Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?”

Riverside sale

60 Meadow Drive, listed at $5.950 million, sold for $6.409. Busy day for Ellen Mosher, who not only came up with these buyers (from the Upper East Side), but also the buyer for 579 Indian Field Road, which also closed yesterday, at $40 million.

(Ann Simpson, Heather Platt were the respective listing agents, so they won’t be worrying about another suspension of SNAP payments, either. )